The upcoming Halon 5.1 release introduces a new SMTP server proxy script. It’s configured to be executed before specific (or all) SMTP commands, even command which isn’t recognised by the SMTP server. In this blog we’ll describe how to implement our proposed SMTP LANG extension using this new script hook. First of all, we announce the LANG extension and the languages supported in the HELO script:
We celebrate the new year with news on the upcoming release, which bundles many exciting features.
First and foremost, the new RESTful API with an OpenAPI specification makes integration into various development and deployment toolchains much more enjoyable. Since most of our customers already integrate Halon into their directories and control panels by making REST queries from Halon, it makes perfect sense that Halon can be provisioned in the same way.
Secondly, we’re introducing a new end-of-DATA script that’s executed once per message, as opposed to the per-recipient DATA script. Whereas the per-recipient version is convenient when you want to treat each recipient individually and let the Halon software take care of queueing and consolidating the respective actions into an SMTP response, the per-message version gives you maximum flexibility and control over execution. The $transaction variable is populated gradually during the SMTP conversation with sender information, and an array with recipients accepted by each RCPT TO command. To then relay a message to its recipients, you call Queue() for each $transaction["recipients"] and then Accept(). Making per-recipient message modifications using the MIME() class is now easier thanks to the new snapshot() and restore() methods.
The code editor’s built-in CSV editor now supports custom form controls, defined like a “schema” on a per-file basis using a JSON format. You can use checkboxes for booleans, select controllers for enumerated types, and input fields with validation for things like dates, email addresses or any regular expression you like. It makes it much more convenient and safe to create and edit lists and settings that you want to have in your Halon configuration file.
There’s a new LDAP() class that replaces the previous ldap_ functions and LDAP settings in the configuration. It provides greater flexibility, and an improved usage pattern using an iterable LDAP result object.
Finally, there are massive under-the-hood improvements. There’s a new on-disk YAML configurations with JSON schemas and Protobuf control sockets, which is used by the componentised Linux package’s new Visual Studio Code plugin and command line tools. The integrated package is built on FreeBSD 12, which ships with OpenSSL 1.1 and thus TLS 1.3 support. It was published as a standard by IETF in August last year, and is much anticipated as it contains many security improvements over previous TLS versions. The queue database is now using the latest and greatest PostgreSQL version 11.1, and the queue is automatically migrated on boot as usual.
We have that you’ll like this new release as much as we do! Check out the full changelog on GitHub for more information, and familiarise yourself with the important changes outlined in the release notes document before upgrading.
Halon 4.0 introduced a feature we call “live staging” where you can deploy multiple running configurations at the same time, with per-connection conditions. It allows you to reliably rollout changes or new features to a production system for only a few testing IPs, or a select percentage of the traffic. With Halon 4.7, we proudly present “live debugging” using which you can add logpoints to your scripts. It enables you to inspect the full context of SMTP transactions in real-time, using the live staging conditions as connection selector.
Those points are added directly to the Monaco-based IDE, and results are inspected on a per-connection basis. You can create multiple points, triggered by multiple messages, and jump back and forth between them.
Authenticated Received Chain (ARC) is a proposed standard that have been developed to help address issues with DMARC and certain forwarders, such as mailing lists. It defines a standard for how to pass authentication results from one intermediary to another, making this information available to the recipient system. It works even in the case of multiple intermediaries, a.k.a. a chain
DMARC verifies the sender authenticity, as specified by the RFC5322.From header domain name, using SPF and DKIM. Certain indirect email flows such as mailing lists break this by altering the message, while maintaining the original From header. It causes issues for both senders that publish a DMARC policy, and receivers that verify DMARC. The two large mailbox providers AOL and Yahoo published a p=reject DMARC policy for their domains in 2014, causing some disruption for senders on those domains. It occurred when emailing recipients on mailbox services that verifies DMARC via for example mailing lists. This was, and still is, remedied by ad-hoc solutions.
ARC in itself isn’t a reputation system. The specification doesn’t define how the reputation of intermediates should be tracked, nor how public lists should be operated. In other words, as a recipient mailbox provider you still have to operate such systems in order to make use of the information that ARC provides. DMARC.org announced ARC at a M3AAWG meeting in Atlanta, 2015, where it’s been a frequent topic ever since.
$chain = ARC::chainValidate();
if ($chain["status"] == "pass" or $chain["status"] == "none")
"201805", "example.com", "pki:arc",
->SPF(["smtp.client-ip" => $senderip])
->addMethod("arc", $chain["status"], ["header.oldest-pass" => $chain["oldestpass"] ?? "0"])
We have just released an implementation for ARC (draft 14) on Github, which supports both verification and (re)sealing. It’s written in Halon script, and we’re using it on our own domain to start with. If you’re interested in taking it for a spin, just let us know.
M3AAWG meetings are an exceptional opportunity to discuss the latest in messaging security with other professionals in a focused environment of working sessions and educational panels. This time we meet in Munich, Germany. Leading industry experts, researchers and public policy officials address such diverse topics as bot mitigation practices, social networking abuse, mobile abuse and pending legislation.
As an official supporter member, we will of course participate in the Munich meeting on June 4th-7th. If you want to meet up, just get in touch!
You probably know from before that Halon’s scriptable SMTP server enable email providers to avoid blacklisting and increase deliverability. The 4.6 release, “curry”, contains Cyren’s outbound anti-spam (OAS). In combination with our cluster-synchronised rate limit function, it provides incredibly effective and accurate abuse prevention. Just like their Cyren’s inbound anti-spam, OAS uses a hash-sharing technology called recurrent pattern detection (RPD) that identifies outbreak patterns. It’s designed to detect spam from internal sources rather than external, and doesn’t report/contribute any signatures since it could blacklist your own infrastructure.
With the flexibility of scripting you can determine customer/sender identities accurately even in mixed traffic. This is used as identifier for rate limits based on classifiers such as Cyren’s OAS, delivery failure rate, queue size, etc. By using IP source hashing and alternative IPs for suspicious traffic, deferring obvious abuse and controlling connection concurrency, you can achieve high deliverability with minimal administration.
The 4.6 release comes with many additional features and improvements. It adds SNI support to the TLS functions. The Monaco-based code editor now have additional code completion, built-in documentation, tabs, and a mini-map.
In the beginning, everything was ASCII and English. Since then, we’ve seen Unicode (international character sets) and IDN (international domains names) become widely adopted. Last year we implemented SMTPUTF8 that enables international mailboxes.
So why not support other languages in text-based protocols? We give to you “The SMTP Service Extension for Protocol Internationalization” RFC draft, introducing the EHLO keyword LANG. It will be the first SMTP software to support our to-be submitted RFC draft. Initially it will support Swedish, Spanish and Australian, and will default to Swedish when talking to supported systems.
250-LANG SE ES AU
BREV TILL:<hå[email protected]än.se>
250 Togs emot
250 Vi ses!
If you made it this far, April fool! We will publish information on the upcoming 4.6 release some time after the 1st of April.
April 28th marks the date for Halon’s 10th anniversary and I would like to share with you the story about Halon’s scripting language, HSL. In order to understand why we created our own scripting language you have to look back at what it was intended to do, and the landscape of embeddable languages in 2007.
The Halon scripting language started out as an idea of having a dynamic configuration. We wanted people to easily be able to weight the results of different anti-spam engines (Cyren’s RPD and SpamAssassin). Hence, we came up with the idea of having a simple language with functions, ScanRPD returning the spam score from the Cyren engine, and ScanSA returning the result of SpamAssassin. The configuration could look like:
if (ScanSA() > 5 and ScanRPD() > 0) Reject();
if (ScanSA() > 3 and ScanRPD() >= 50) Reject();
In order to facilitate this, we needed a simple scripting language. At the time, the intent was not to allow any general purpose programming features. We didn’t even want loops, in order to prevent runaway programs.
Creating a domain-specific scripting language
If you’re not into programming languages, I should explain that creating a simple domain-specific scripting language is easy. There are tons of guides and it doesn’t take more than a few lines until you get simple arithmetic to work (5 + 6). The hardest and most important part of creating a language is the design, also called the syntax. You want to make it as easy as possible to read and write.
Why not choose an established scripting language?
Sieve (rfc3028), could technically have been an alternative, but in 2007 we hadn’t heard about Sieve. It crossed our paths a few years later. Speaking against it; Sieve was created by Mirapoint, an email gateway competitor at the time. Looking back, it was probably good that we didn’t end up using Sieve. Having our own language made our own platform evolve way beyond Sieve, and what you would expect of a traditional email gateway.
Lua, it just didn’t happen and I suspect that if we would have considered Lua it would had been too large and unfamiliar as a language for our initial goal. Despite the fact that arrays starts at one 😃.
Easy to learn and easy to build upon
One of the most innovating features of HSL is the cache statement as it allows you to cache the result of any function call based on the input arguments. Sure, the same functionality can be built in other ways, but having such a powerful tool so easy at hand in HSL makes it stand out. It gets really neat when you do network lookup queries, such as API lookups using http() or ldap_search().
I personally really like the concept of custom languages, I think it’s important to try to evolve and challenge the concept of established languages, and by doing so we progress and learn from each other. I think every new language brings something new to the table; it can be a specific feature or the entire concept of why it was created in the first place.
M3AAWG is the Messaging, Malware and Mobile Anti-Abuse Working Group, a trusted global forum that focuses on operational issues of internet abuse, including technology, industry collaboration and public policy. They host three general meetings per year, two in the US and one in Europe, and Halon will be one of the sponsors at this years first General Meeting in San Francisco in late February.
With over 200 members worldwide, including giants such as Apple, Google and Microsoft as well as many smaller companies, M3AAWG is the largest global association of the industry. Companies can apply for different levels of membership, Sponsor, Full Member and Supporter. Halon became a supporter one year ago today and is represented by CTO Erik Lax and CPO Anders Berggren:
I’m very proud that we got accepted into M3AAWG. Halon is committed to help driving email transport encryption adoption, and we participate in the Special Interest Group for pervasive monitoring.
The main focus in Halon 4.5 release is TLS, hence the name “certy”. Check out the the new features and functions and try them out. Also, the knowledge base is growing with a lot of good how-to’s to help you around.
TLS information has been made accessible in the Halon Platform scripting language, both on the receiving and sending side. Support for X.509 client certificates has been added, allowing you to both verify the sender identity in the SMTP server, as well as identify yourself when sending email through an SMTP client.
Experiment: we configured a busy email system to ask for a client certificate for all inbound connections, and found that approximate 5% of all traffic provides a client identity. Most of the traffic is from Gmail and Office356. We did not collect the percentage of domains, which we leave as an exercise for you.
How to enable this feature and start authenticating clients was documented as KB article.
Implementation and facilitation of TLS reporting (tlsrpt) has begun. It is a new standard for reporting TLS failures, mainly focused on MTA-STS and DANE.
The TLSSocket() class now have a getpeercert() function and the ability to specify a client certificate. Now you see why we called it” certy”?
Support for custom SASL authentication mechanism has been added. This allows you to build authentication schemes such as OTP, OAUTHBEARER or CRAM-MD5, but also EXTERNAL to facilitate the client certificate features. The procedure is documented in our knowledge base along with two sample implementations.
If you haven’t found our knowledge base before, the KB is a place to find how-to’s. The dev team is expanding it as fast as we can, adding topics that customers have asked about.
Finally, I want to highlight the big effort we’ve done to simplify, modernize and overall improve the web administration. This is an ongoing project, and something that we’re paying a lot of attention to. We want to thank, and congratulate, the Bootstrap team for providing such a awesome framework. We managed to get the Bootstrap 4.0 release in, with just a few days of work.
The Halon MTA is a flexible email operations and security platform.
It enables organisations that operate large-scale email services to offer competitive features by rapid implementation
and to lower maintenance costs through reliable deployment and reduced complexity.